Obama And Congressional Authorization For An American Attack, Act Of War, Against Syria!!

I'll Let You Connect The Dots...

I've been racking my brain for two full days, and I have a fairly powerful brain. To answer this question...

"Why would Obama, who's every policy has been rooted totally in political calculation to build and satisfy his power base, liberal voting block, be taking an action that HE KNOWS will cost him the voter support he needs to win total power in Congress in the 2014 election. He KNOWS taking America into another war, from which no matter which way you look at it is LOSE-LOSE, for America. He KNOWS as far as American politics he is committing political suicide. He KNOWS taking America into an obvious LOSE-LOSE WAR is going to cost him the majority of his Liberal voting base and control over Congress!

WHY WOULD HE DO THAT? WHY WOULD HE COMMIT POLITICAL SUICIDE FOR DEMOCRATIC PARTY'S CONTROL OVER AMERICA, ONE YEAR OUT FROM AN ELECTION THAT COULD GIVE HIM TOTAL POWER TO MAKE HIS AGENDA INTO A REALITY?"

The ONLY logical, rational explanation, answer, to that question? Is because, he KNOWS if he commits this Act Of War against Syria, Iran, China and Russia? In his political calculation there will not BE an American 2014 election!

Now, let's look at Obama's interactions and strategies we've ALL witnessed with OUR OWN eyes and ears.

CHINA. Has Obama sought to lessen China's financial leverage, it's OWNING of America, America's dependence on China's money to pay America's bills??! NO!! In fact, he's done the complete opposite. Obama chose to run up the National debt, mostly held by China, almost twice the amount of that built in the first 250 years of our nation's existence. He's made sure that we are totally dependent on China's money to keep America being able to pay it's bills. He made sure that China had the economic/financial power, control, leverage over America that America would ultimately have no choice but to be subservient to China. OR cease to exist through it's own inability to support it's own fiscal responsibilities, finance it's own military defense, etc.

RUSSIA. What nation was Obama accidently caught on audio/video, him thinking the microphone was off? Telling that country, that he is willing to betray the will of the American people? By keeping from the American people before his re-election, knowledge of his intention to betray them with more nuclear disarmament, American defense systems against Russia. Than the American people would be comfortable and willing to accept which would cost him the election? The answer is RUSSIA. He very blatantly stated to Russia, he KNEW he was betraying the American people for the sake of giving Russia what it wanted in greater dismantling of American nuclear defense mechanisms. DEFENSE MECHANISMS!

IRAN. What has Obama done EVERY TIME America has had any success at slowing down IRAN'S efforts at acquiring a nuclear weapon? He's TOLD IRAN exactly what it was America was doing that was causing problems with Iran's ability to enrich Uranium to have a nuclear weapon! Obama has been totally hands off on Iran's nuclear weapon efforts. When he had no other choice but to "appear" to be working against Iran's weapon efforts. He told Iran what America was doing to interfere with their acquiring nuclear weapons effort. Totally undermining the success America was having in stopping Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability.

Now, let's look at our traditional allies in the Middle East or those who were not allies, but were also completely under control of America's thumb, control. allowing American to maintain some level of stability in the Middle East..

ISRAEL. Obama NEVER EVEN VISITED ISRAEL, in his whole first term! He totally refused to meet with Israel''s Prime Minister, Netanyahu when he came to Washington to discuss the Middle East. He also told Israel that it needed to go back to it's 1967 borders, giving back territory to the terrorists that attack Israel on a daily basis, who vow to destroy Israel, which would guarantee Israel's destruction. Obama, again caught on what he thought was an off microphone, totally besmirched and mocked This was his exchange was between French President Sarkovsky and Obama... Sarkovsky, 'Netanyahu, I can't stand him. He's a liar...' Obama: 'You're sick of him, but I have to deal with him every day...' Obama showing his total disdain for Israel.

Let's recap so far... Obama promises Russia, our enemy, that he will dismantle more of our Nuclear DEFENSE mechanisms, admitting in the process that he's well aware he's betraying the American people in doing so. Admitting that he's well aware that he's betraying the American people promising Russia this, which is why he knew if America knew the truth they would not re-elect him. He lies to the American people and makes promises against America's National Security to our enemy Russia. While at the same time Obama totally shits all over our greatest, longest ally in the Middle East, Israel.

EGYPT. Although, Hosni Mubarak, was a dictator, he was also our ally who served to protect American interests and was America's greatest political ally in the Middle East outside of Israel. Obama chose to allow Hosni Mubarak to be toppled, KNOWING full well, that Mubarek would be replaced by the murderous, barbaric Muslim Brotherhood who backs and supports Al Qaeda and who vows to destroy Israel and is the greatest supporter and promoter of terrorism against America and American citizens.

LIBYA. Libya has not been a threat to America on any level for over 30 years. YET, "out of the blue" Obama decides to go to war against Libya, to remove Muammar Gaddafi from power, also a dictator. But, a dictator that kept stability in the Middle East and had shown no interest in tangling with the United States on any level since Ronald Reagan put him in his place. Obama KNEW Libya would be taken over and controlled by Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood. When these same, American enemies, people, OBAMA put into power in Libya, attack and murder our American citizens including our Ambassador, ON American soil. Obama did not lift a finger to go against the Islamist, Al Qaeda elements that attacked our Consulate and murdered our citizens. NOR did he lift a finger to rescue our American people fighting for their lives. NOR has he lifted a finger to bring those Islamist terrorists murderer people to justice!

SYRIA. Who will be benefited by Obama serving to topple the Assad regime in Syria?? The EXACT SAME murderous, barbaric, "vow to destroy America and Americans and Israel" Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda! They are the rebels. Just yesterday we saw a video of these murderous terrorists rebels, torturing and executing Syrain soldiers. Obama has single handedly paved the way for the world of Islamist terrorist to take power and control of the Middle East. The exact purpose of his military toppling of Libya and political toppling of Egypt. He's attacking every enemy he has personally chosen to strengthen in power and leverage AGAINST America. Pertaining to Syria, he's vowed to do the same.. with or without our support... single handedly.

Let's recap again. At this point, we see that in actual action's of Obama. He has purposely strengthened the position of America's greatest enemies China, Russia, Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda. By driving America to a point of being so "owned" by China, ultimately America would have no power but to be subservient to China's wishes or crumble as a nation. He's toppled, the American National Security interests favorable leaders in the Middle East. The Middle East power structures in nations that opened up greater power of control of the Middle East to the terrorists organizations that vow to destroy both Israel AND America. While doing everything he can to weaken Israel's position for self-preservation.

By every action pertaining to our greatest world enemies and greatest allies in the Middle East. Obama has used policy that STRENGTHENS the position of every one of our ENEMIES while at the same time WEAKENING or DESTROYING the position of every one of our ALLIES. Undeniable fact! YOU connect the dots!

So, now, our President, Barack Obama, has put us in a position of attacking Syria, Russia, China, Iran... whom he's continually treated in actions and policy with SUPPORT, strengthening of their position against America? Giving these arch enemies of America full legal standing and justification to attack America in the eyes of the world? After having destroyed or weakened virtually EVERY military ally America had in the Middle East and having turned the back upon America, in this situation, of every Military ally America has traditionally had in the other countries of the world!

People, we have been being setup by our President, Barack Hussein Obama, for the last five years. For exactly this moment. Obama is on the verge of starting World War II and THAT IS HIS INTENTION! America will NOT WIN this WAR. THAT is his intention as well. That's why he has desecrated our military to the point. That General Martin Dempsey, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff recently stated, "the (American Military) force is so degraded and so unready that it would be immoral to use the (American Military) force."

Obama has strengthened every single American enemy in it's position while weakening or destroying every single American Ally in the Middle East and turning our traditional Military allies support away from us. While desecrating our own American Military to the point that the Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff has stated our military is so weak that it would be IMMORAL to force them into battle. Which I interpret as, "we would be slaughtered, literally." You REALLY think all of this is simply odd pieces of "coincidence"??!!

Obama, is on the verge of lighting the fuse of WWIII against America. Our traditional world allies, do NOT support an American strike against Syria. I do not believe they would back us in a WWIII scenario. Obama has put all greater power, strength, leverage in the hands of our ENEMIES! While destroying our own military defense capabilities to a point that we simply could not WIN a WWIII and would be toppled, defeated, destroyed... ALL PURPOSEFULLY!!

The way I see it? Is the ONLY WAY the American people WILL survive this current situation, because Obama is going to do it whether we like it or not. He's been setting up the dominoes of toppling America, destroying and defeating America, for FIVE years! BUT, IF like Great Britain, the AMERICAN PEOPLE, show they ARE NOT IN SUPPORT of attacking Syria, the same as the British! That it's ONLY ONE MAN, not the WILL of the American People, through voicing their opinions to DENY Congressional Authorization (will of the People) for an attack on Syria?

Then, I DO believe our traditional allies WILL COME TO OUR DEFENSE!! Because, the American People themselves, WERE on their SAME SIDE OF THE EQUATION on this issue with our traditional military allies on this Syria issue. BEFORE, Obama took it on HIS OWN to attack Syria, AGAINST THE WILL OF HIS OWN PEOPLE... to PURPOSEFULLY ignite the fuse of WWIII, having spent FIVE years setting up every mechanism to ASSURE AMERICA'S DEFEAT!

What WE THE PEOPLE choose to do today, in this moment of time. In reference to giving Congressional Authorization for an Act Of War, attack, on Syria. No doubt determines whether we will continue to survive, literally nor not. Whether or not, WE as a PEOPLE continue to remain an Independent FREE Sovereign nation.

Why is Obama committing political suicide in American politics one year out from the 2014 election? Because, he doesn't plan on there BEING a 2014 election!!

I ask that you please click "Share" on this writing so it goes as far across America and the world as possible. The truth must be known an who knows what may come my way for sharing it with you. I do not believe it will be taken lightly by the powers behind this whole situation. I wrote in a way to allow YOU to see it all yourself. To allow YOU to use your OWN brains to connect the dots. I share it, because I care about you all and love "America."

I can afford to be wrong here, but I truly do not believe I am. This is a perfectly fitting jigsaw puzzle. Where all pieces have been systematically, strategically and perfectly fitting into place Behind the distracted eyes of the eyes of the American people purposely distracted by created American social issue politics. All pieces that fit perfectly into place, where no pieces are missing nor being forced into place to who the "Big Picture." But, you assess the facts for yourself.

Obama signing the Monsanto Protection Act, just as against every bone in a liberal's body as him taking America to war at this time. It's all part of the same thing.

"Why is Obama committing political suicide in American politics one year out from the 2014 election? Because, he doesn't plan on there BEING a 2014 election!!"

I can afford to be wrong. But, the important question to you is, "Can YOU AFFORD for me to be RIGHT?"

The ONLY Way To Beat Obama in 2012! A Word To The Wise of the "We Must Defeat Obama" People!

Anyone who TRULY understands politics (that which motivates versus disenfranchises voter support) will be able to see the terrifying consequences in sweeping decisive Republican defeats throughout the whole political system on every governmental level. IF they nominate Mitt Romney as their Presidential candidate to run against Obama. Here's "why?"

Consider this Obama 30 second media blitz ad featuring Barrack Obama, "What is it that the American people DESPISE the most about Washington politics? You know the answer the same as me, the COMPLETE AND TOTAL HYPOCRISY OF BOTH PARTIES IN WASHINGTON! You know, 'It's okay if you do it, but it's not okay if I do it.'

The Republicans put up Mitt Romney to run against me in this Presidential Election. They attack me for Government mandated Health Care. YET, Mitt Romney invented Government Mandated Health Care as Governor of Massachusetts. The ONLY man in America to impose Government Mandated Health Care on the American people, BEFORE me. You know, 'It's okay if he does it, but it's not okay for me to do it. COMPLETE, TRANSPARENT, BLATANT, UNDENIABLE HYPOCRISY.

The Republicans put up Mitt Romney to run against me in this Presidential Election and attack me for Religious intolerance towards the Catholic Church, because I believe all Americans should be allowed all benefits provided in the Affordable Health Care Act, Obamacare. YET, When Mitt Romney was governor of Massachusetts, he made a decision to end the program of Kosher food for Jewish People in Medicare subsidized nursing homes. You know, 'It's okay if he does it, but it's not okay for me to do it. COMPLETE, TRANSPARENT, BLATANT, UNDENIABLE HYPOCRISY.

The Republicans put up Mitt Romney to run against me in this Presidential Election and attack me for supposedly not being able to create jobs. YET, When Mitt Romney was Governor of Massachusetts his state was ranked NUMBER FORTY-SEVEN, that's three from the bottom of all 50 states, in job creation. You know, 'It's okay if he does it, but it's not okay for me to do it. COMPLETE, TRANSPARENT, BLATANT, UNDENIABLE HYPOCRISY.

I ask you, the American People, do we need MORE HYPOCRISY in our American political systems. OR do we need LESS HYPOCRISY in our American Political system. The Republicans are showing you by having Mitt Romney as their candidate against me. That THEY ARE THE FACE OF AND PARTY OF HYPOCRISY in American politics. You can vote for me and every other Democrat or you can vote for HYPOCRISY, Republican party."

Obama can take that one 30 second ad and run it in the media how ever many times $1 BILLION will buy and totally and completely brand the Republican party as a synonym for HYPOCRISY! Creating sweeping defeats throughout every election in the American political system.

The majority of American voters vote based on 30 second sound bytes. This thirty second "Republican = Complete, Blatant, Total Hypocrisy" sound byte will defeat every ounce of hope Republicans could have in winning ANY political race. That's what I'd do if I were Obama, how about you?

A word to the wise in the "We must defeat Obama" people in America. The most electable challenger is the man who the most people will get behind and show up at the polls to defeat Obama. Which means you have to back whoever the "moral values" voters support. Because, they are the sector of the electorate who will choose to not vote at all rather than to vote against their moral values, their conscience. That's just who they are and they don't care if you think they are stupid or not. Their self-respect, personal integrity and adhering to their personal values of "right and wrong" is more important to them, than living through four more years of Obama. They won't cast a vote simply to beat Obama. So, if you want to defeat Obama you have to put up a candidate THEY will support. They won't vote for Romney. This is exactly why during the whole primary season you have seen this constant shift to differing conservative primary candidates as opposed to getting behind Romney.

The people who's main objective is to defeat Obama will back any candidate to do that. BUT, the moral majority "values voters" will not do that. They won't vote for a candidate that they see themselves selling-out their own values to vote for. As I did to vote for McCain in '08. I myself will never do that again. The last Republican they backed for President was George Bush and that's the last Presidency the Republicans won. They trusted him, his values, his morals his strong sense of conviction. HOWEVER, 2 MILLION of them chose to turn their backs on him in the 2,000 election, because of the George Bush DUI story that broke the night before the election. Even though they knew an Al Gore Presidency would have been a nightmare. They felt Bush had been dishonest with them by not sharing the DUI thing with them, PERSONALLY, before the election. That he had hid that information from them. Had he himself shared the DUI issue at any point prior, it would have been irrelevant. That situation almost cost George Bush the election.

Remember the 2,000 election? It was so close that the Supreme Court had to decide it. Had those 2 MILLION "moral values" voters not decided to stay home on election day he would have had a decisive victory. You cannot defeat Obama unless you put up a candidate THEY will support and go to the polls to vote for. That's NOT Romney. They don't trust Romney, they don't see him as a man of conviction to conservative principles and his record supports their thoughts there. They see him as total hypocrisy when compared to Obama. To them Government Mandated Health Care is "wrong" on any level of government, PERIOD. They know it's wrong and dishonest for a man who's done the same things to attack another man for the same things. Government Mandated Health Care, Religious Insensitivity, Job Creation where Romney's state as Governor was ranked #47 in job creation, three from the bottom. These are three points of MAJOR hypocrisy in a Romney candidacy against Obama. They won't support total hypocrisy, it goes against their moral values, personal principles, "right and wrong." The things that define them, their lives and choices in life. But, more importantly to you "We must defeat Obama" people, how they vote.

They are the overwhelming majority who voted in the Bible Belt primary of South Carolina for Newt Gingrich, slaughtering Mitt Romney. They are the 52% who voted AGAINST Romney in Florida. The appreciate and respect how they saw Newt Gingrich starting the primary pushing hard for a positive primary process. Expressing praise and appreciation for his own opponents in the primary process. They resent Romney for changing that "positive" primary approach by initiating an all out WAR of bloodbath in Iowa with the negative attack ads. They KNOW what happened in 1999 with Newt Gingrich and that he did NOT resign in disgrace over ethics violations. They know the ethics violations were two years earlier and THEY re-elected him afterwards, because they knew the ethics violations were a total political ruse. All of this dishonest behavior on Romney's end furthers their feelings that he cannot be trusted. Because, he's a dishonest man. They are the people who still have Gingrich polling as #1 in the National Polls.

If you put Romney up as your candidate, they will not support him in the voting booth in the massive proportion you need to win. So, if you want to defeat Obama. You MUST put up a candidate that THEY will support then all those who will vote for anybody to defeat Obama has to support their candidate. Because, you can't defeat Obama without them and they are not people who will vote for just anybody, simply to defeat Obama, when you will.

Obama is polling at around 46% approval, versus 47% disapproval. Obama's 46% are the Americans already receiving some form of government entitlement. They are not going to budge away from Obama.  If we lose this election to Obama, he will spend four more years putting more American voters into Government Entitlement programs to guarantee their future votes for his party and his ideology.  As I type this, the Obama Administration is ALREADY fining states for not signing up enough people, a quota, for government entitlement Programs.  To serve the exact purpose I just spoke of.

That means to beat Obama, in addition to making sure the 47% percent who disapprove of Obama go to the voting booth to vote against him, you have to pick up the 4% "undecided" to win. So, you MUST have a candidate that the moral majority, "values voters" WILL support and go to the polls to vote for to defeat Obama. Just because 47% disapprove of Obama, doesn't meant that 47% will vote for whoever Republicans put up against him.

This is your only chance of ever defeating Obama, because you will never be able to talk the "moral values" voters into selling-out their personal values, personal integrity, self-respect and principles of "right and wrong." Simply to defeat Obama.

All of this is why Newt Gingrich is the ONLY hope of a Republican win against Obama.  Santorum is a wonderful man, but his anti-gay views will cost him support, even with "moral values" voters.  Who may not agree with the "gay" lifestyle, but still think it's wrong to condemn them as people.  There is a difference between "the religious right" and the "values voters."  The "religious right" is a sub-sector of the "values voters." Ron Paul is a wonderful man, but his foreign policy beliefs will make him unelectable, because people do recognize the true threat of Iran.

As does Newt Gingrich, I understand the dynamics of the electorate. The people who you need to be able to get behind your candidate to defeat Obama. The reason Newt Gingrich is still leading in the National Polls. The reason Romney can never get a majority of the republican vote in the primary votes. Because, the majority of the people you need to vote for your candidate to defeat Obama DO NOT WANT ROMNEY. That's why the primaries have blatantly shown this fact. The whole concept of the NON-Romney candidate being the choice in the primaries. The 52% who voted against Romney in Florida, the 67% who voted against Romney in Iowa, the 59% who voted against Romney in New Hampshire, the 71% who voted against Romney in South Carolina. Romney simply cannot get a majority of support, because he can't get the "moral values" voters to vote for him. You can't win without them. They won't support him if they see a conflict in their personal values in supporting him. He's got a ton of baggage in that area with that block of voters the republicans need to defeat Obama. They won't hold their noses and vote for Romney on any significant numbers level to give Romney a win.

To them Gingrich has no baggage. The majority of those "moral values' voters personal principles, personal values, self-respect, personal integrity is based in the Christian faith. "Jesus died for our sins." Meaning they understand we WILL sin. They understand the whole premise of the Christian faith is based on accepting personal responsibility for you sins, which you WILL have. Then seeking forgiveness and being granted redemption. Once again cleansed. That's why Gingrich's marital infidelities of 15 years ago don't matter to them. As reflected in the Bible Belt primary of South Carolina. That's why they support him. If you are unwilling to forgive a man who has taken personal responsibility for his "sinful" actions, has asked for forgiveness and been given redemption, recommitted to his faith, reflected in how he's lived his life after that process. Then to them you are not a good person, not a good "Christian" if you continue to condemn him for those past digressions They also resent anyone who attacks a man, on those same issues, who has already gone through the redemption process.

The things the Romney camp attacks Gingrich on like sitting down on a bench with Nancy Pelosi to reflect a need to protect the environment. Is actually a POSITIVE thing in Newt's favor in a General Election. Because, if just might get some Liberals who are dissatisfied with Obama to vote for Gingrich. A guy with a successful track record in Washington, job creation, balanced budgets, putting people on welfare back into jobs and/or school AND believes that we should at least act responsibility with the environment. That's something some disenchanted Liberals CAN support. They definitely will not support a candidate like Romney who attacks their party man on multiple levels for doing the exact same things that Romney did as Governor. Romney will drive them back to Obama in iron-clad support. Even though they are not happy with Obama, just out of the shear hypocrisy of Romneys', "it's okay if I did it, but it's not okay if you did it" hypocrisy leveled at Obama.

To further the idea that Gingrich is the only possible candidate the might be able to pick up Obama disenchanted Liberal voters.  Something that I have direct knowledge of in having had discussions with hard-core Liberal friends.  Is that they don't care about Newt's 15 year-old marital infidelities.  As least they cannot state with any level of believable credibility that they do care.  Because, their two most revered Presidents of our life time, Bill Clinton, John F. Kennedy and most revered Liberal Senator, Ted Kennedy are all proven to have been incredible philanderers and guilty of their own marital infidelities.  Which is the exact argument Gingrich would make to diffuse that issue if brought up by Liberals in a General Election.  I've actually had hard-core Liberals tell me, "David, I would never admit this to any of my Liberal friends.  But, as much as I don't care for Newt on a personal level.  Gingrich is the ONLY candidate I would vote for over Obama.  Because, I do recognize that he is a man that gets things done in Washington.  Something he proved as Speaker of the House."  Even Liberals don't care for the overwhelming Washington hypocrisy in the system, nor the do nothing Congresses there.

Although, the "values" voters, don't like Gingrich's negative campaigning strategy against Romney. They give Gingrich a break on it. Because, they know he tried to get all the Republican candidates to run positive campaigns in this primary process. Which they totally appreciated and respected, saw as "right." They saw ROMNEY start the bloodbath war of negative campaigning in Iowa and ever since. They know that Newt had no choice but to respond, play by Romney's "wrong," rules, choice of negative attack ads.

You can't defeat Obama without these people and you will never, ever talk them into selling-out their personal values simply to defeat Obama. They don't believe in "win at any cost." They believe in adhering to their personal moral values and principles at any cost.

That's the reality of the voter dynamic in this election that you have to work with to defeat Obama. Romney is the ONE candidate who cannot get the biggest block of Republican voters behind him in committed support to defeat Obama.

The people who are approaching the 2012 Election from a mind-set of "I will vote for any candidate the Republicans put up. To defeat Obama." Don't understand the "moral values" majority of the Republican party who are approaching the 2012 Election from a standpoint of, "I will vote for any Republican candidate who supports my values, of whom I don't feel I have to sell-out my personal values, principles, self-respect, personal integrity to vote for, to beat Obama." But, it doesn't matter if you don't understand them. What matters is recognizing that you cannot defeat Obama without them.

If you want to defeat Obama. The people who approach the 2012 Election from "I will vote for any Republican candidate to defeat Obama" need to get behind the Republican candidate who the "I won't sell-out my personal values to defeat Obama" people WILL support and WILL vote for in the 2012 General Election. :)

That's how you defeat Obama in the 2012 Election. :) REALITY CHECK!

To be able to win at politics you have to have the ability to get inside the heads of those who's support you need to win. Be able to get inside their psyche to understand, "that which motivates and disenfranchises voter support." That IS politics. That's what I've just done for you in these posts. It's not me trying to cheer-lead the guy I support. That's me explaining the reality of what it's going to take to defeat Obama.

I've laid it out there with complete and total clarity. Whether or not you want to accept it to defeat Obama, is up to you.

All of this is EXACTLY how Obama won the 2008 Election with absolutely no track record of political accomplishment. It's also how he will defeat Romney. Obama knows the thing people hate most about Washington politics is the complete and total hypocrisy that exists there in BOTH parties. THAT'S EXACTLY WHERE OBAMA'S GOING TO SHOOT HIS ARROW AT ROMNEY AND ROMNEY IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE THAT GIVES OBAMA THAT ABILITY.

So, you don't put the candidate up against Obama who gives Obama the gun to shoot the Republican party with. Not only in the Presidential election but in ALL Republican elections... "Vote Republican = Vote Hypocrisy! So, vote Democrat!" THAT WINS! Because, the American people HATE the hypocrisy of Washington politics and they won't vote for MORE obvious hypocrisy into office.

David Axelrod, Obama's Chief Campaign Strategist, has already revealed this strategy. When he tweeted how the explanation given of Romneycare in the last Republican debate was a concise description of the Affordable Health Care Act, Obamacare. TELLING US, they are going to attack Romney as the candidate of Hypocrisy. You can either play into their Obama winning strategy, or you can remove the candidate that provides that Obama winning strategy opportunity.

It is, what it is.

America On The Verge Of Reclaiming Societal Decency Rather Than Moral Depravity Narcissism, As A Social Standard!

Something I've been feeling rumbling down inside for about a week now, is a sense that the bulk of the American people are going to reject continued moral depravity in our society as "acceptable."  Not from a religious standpoint, but from a simple standpoint of consciable "right and wrong" principles.  I feel people are tired of being forced to a standard that truly is not acceptable in their eyes for our society.  I feel this is being driven, by having lived in a place of feeling so surpressed due to our dismal economic situations and the new government policies they hear about every day that further serve to squash their sense of feeling "hope" and "good" down inside their spirits and souls. 

I think the government's continual, "hammer them down," "divide them," "break their spirit" rhetoric has pushed a major sector of our society to a place of no longer being willing to accept narcissistic moral depravity as an acceptable part of our society.  I mean look at what the American people had to learn this week about how low our government will go to the point of a Christmas Tree Tax.  The sense of Christmas is one place of a feeling of "good" and "joy" left to our people at this point and they tax that too, while we weren't looking.  It's like if you turn your back for a second this current federal government will rob you blind.  "We are stealing your Christmas buy putting our mark of 'government owned' on that too," in principle.

Look at the horrible situation that's been hidden and protected for years at Penn State.  People knew about a coach molesting ten year old boys for years, and did NOTHING.  All to protect their own interest, moral depravity narcissism.  Then the response of the Penn State students when the one's responsible for allowing the continued molestation of more little boys to persist, were fired by the school.  Destroying people's cars, property, etc.  All making a statment, "We don't care about those little boys!  We want our football!"  Total moral depravity narcissism.  Sure screwing up ONE season of football sucks.  But, screwing up a whole lifetime for MANY little boys is way more sacrifice than one football season.  Especially, when those boys being knowingly molested was hidden to protect the football seasons.  How can anybody of moral decency sympathise with those Penn State students rioting out in the streets?  They reflect the worst a society could hope for in a people when you consider the whole big picture of it all.

I'm seeing the same thing, right or wrong, with these sexual harrasment claims against Herman Cain.  More people don't believe them than do.  Why?  Because, they've seen the social moral depravity narcissism used before in this kind of misuse of policy created to protect people used as a weapon of destruction, as opposed to protection.  People are rejecting it.  The tragedy is that something that needs to be taken serious as a societal problem, "sexual harrassment," when it can actually be proven to exist, is designed to help people.  But, when society has shown to use that same tool of protection to conjour up a tool of destruction upon another.  Who under our moral justice system is, "Innocent until PROVEN guilty" which is quite different than "Innocent until ASSUMED guilty."  Then the people who misuse that tool of protection as a tool of destruction totally undermine the credibility and integrity of something created to protect people.

The Occupy Wall Street, etc. protests all over our country attacking the successful that actually create all wealth ANY OF US are allowed to know.  Through their being successful enough to employ every American out there either directly or indirectly.  To attack those who are responsible ultimately for anything of value you own, any dollar you have to feed, clothe, house, educate, have any level of quality-of-life.  To me, reflects a sense of moral depravity narcissism itself.  The top 1% create everything you aquire with a dollar in your pocket.  Through creating the industries, the businesses the innovative products, etc. sold which creates money to hire us.  To which gives us jobs to spend money that serves to hire and finance other businesses, people, totally finances government and government jobs, etc.  "Hey, let's protest to destroy those who are ultimately responsible for every dollar we ever get to spend. Even though without them we'd be naked sleeping in the woods, diging up worms for food!!"

As I stand back as a bystander watching it all.  I see one big ball of moral depravity narcissim anarchy in a big sector of our society.  Where everybody is so "all about me" they've started to develop the taste for flesh and blood and cannibalizing their own society.
 
I reject this, totally.  This not what I'm willing to accept as what we are asked to accept as "acceptable" in our society.  I don't think I'm alone in that assesment and I do believe that a mentality of "greater good" to serve to elevate our society.  Back to a place in "acceptable" is NOT what is unacceptable.  I believe an evolution revolution is going to start growing within the more good natured element of our society.  "We let you guys do your 'little destroy all values of decency' experiment and now we're hear to tell you, NO MORE! NO MORE!  We won't tolerate, 'anything goes', no matter how morally decrepit it is anymore in our society!  We are going to hold you to a higher standard!  Now, it's our turn to fight for DECENCY as a standard in our society!"

In all of the economic and social misery I do sense we are on the verge of something very positive and inspiring.

I HAVE A DREAM

"I Have A Dream"
by David Russell Carter, Sr.

I have a dream, that there will one day be a society where people can have a five minute conversation without the other party constantly checking their cell phone to see what color dress someone else is looking at in a store that they've said the don't like enough to buy anyway.

I have a dream, that one day, people will have the mentality to say, "this is where I want my life to be five years from now and this is how I'm going to get there" instead of "this is not where I want to be right now."

I have a dream, that one day people will be able to come up with an original thought as opposed to just repeating something they heard from some one else and chose to blindly believe, because it required less intellectual effort.

I have a dream, that one day people will one day care about the content of a person rather than rather than the content of their house.

I have a dream, that one day and acorn will not be recognized as "some brown round thing on the ground," but an infinitely perpetuating source of nourishment, shelter, warmth, shade and bounty of gifts for other life forms.

I have a dream of a society where things that matter today and still will matter twenty years from now, take priority over things that won't matter ten minutes from now.

I have a dream, that one day hope wont be, the ability to possess hope.

I have a dream, that one day someone will be able to build a true time machine. So, I can go back to a time and place of where I wouldn't have to dream about the things I dream of mentioned above.

Newt Gingrich Is The "Steve Jobs Of Innovative Thinking" Applied to Government!!

Pretty amazing. I woke up this morning & my brain was 50 years forward in applying thought to government, systems, processes, etc.  All from simply watching the video of the debate between Newt Gingrich and Herman Cain, (to which I provide a link at the bottom of this blog) on American Entitlement Programs and how to better approach them.  All from just listening to Newt Gingrich explain what everybody else has been "missing" in government & application of & within government. Gingrich is definitely innovative. He uses Steve Jobs type thought processes.

Think about it. It takes about 6-9 months to get a government passport. Yet, the places you go to use that passport, other countries. You can stick your ATM card in a machine in Italy. It reads your number, sends the information across 6 or 7 country borders, across the Atlantic Ocean to your bank makes the information transaction, sends the approval information back across the Atlantic Ocean, back across about 6 or 7 country borders & spits out the proper amount of money you requested. Done.

The process needed to be used to apply, create & approve a passport is about the same as applying for a credit card in concept. Taking your information, doing a background check, reviewing your credit history & current & historical financial information, etc. Then sending you an approval. It's the same type system that creates your passport. All of you criminal records, addresses, any associations with people that might not allow you to get a passport is already in government database. What takes so long in the process is the human laden multi-levels of bureaucracy. What makes government so ineffective & inefficient is the incredible daunting level of people in the process. That's human factor where the failure, mistakes, lost information, improperly entered information, human bias, etc. that slows down a process & makes it less efficient & effective & creates so much financial waste while producing miniscule effectiveness.

Gingrich totally makes sense, "We have the technology available, why aren't we using it?" The Visa Corporation has .03% fraud in it's systems, because it uses IBM technology that identifies fraud, blocks it & eliminates it. Yet, the government's own system approaches has a 10% fraud factor. $10 out of every $100 in medicare goes to a fraudulent criminal, that's. That's 3 pennies of fraud at Visa, versus $10 of fraud in government. Our current government approach to this 10% of every dollar lost to fraud is, "We we need more money, so we have to raise your taxes." Meaning you as the tax payer have to make personal financial sacrifice in your life because the government charges you for the cost of the fraud to them.

Gingrich's approach is, "We've started using fraud identifying & eliminating technology to manage our Medicare payments increasing our government funds by 10%, formerly lost to fraud. So we are going to give you back money to better your own life." We all benefit, the only person that loses are the thieves in the Medicare system. It reduces the time & costs of current government bureaucratic expense in the Medicare system. Eliminates all the human links in the chain of bureaucracy that bogs down the system, loses information, improperly processes information, etc.

Apply the same logic to an agency like the I. R. S. An incredible government expense. Yet, it's an agency of that processes pure numbers. All things that can be done more time efficiently & cost efficiently & eliminating the cost & citizen hassle huge human mistakes factor. The greatest cost of government bureaucracy is the labor cost factor. Salaries, benefits, retirements, lost time & cost efficiency to illness, slackers, inefficiency & accuracy at their purpose in function in the human chain of government bureaucracy.

It's easy to see how during his tenure as Speaker Of The House, Gingrich put $5 TRILLION back into the government coffers by reducing the government budget by $3 TRILLION of wasteful expenses & leaving behind a $2 TRILLION budget surplus when he left office.

It's all about changing the way government thinks to accomplish the exact same things & meet the exact same needs of the people. As Gingrich states, "The most difficult thing to get people in Washington to do is THINK."

Once you get in the Newt Gingrich mindset of "thinking" applied to government. All the problems that we are told are so hard to find solutions for in our government and by our government simply ridiculously easy to find in the solutions to those problems.

I encourage you to doe a little intellectual exercise yourself to see what I'm talking about. I've been doing it all morning and am amazed at how simple it is. The only thing that separates your or me from being able to find the answers to solutions our government can seem to find is "THINKING!"

Let's look at situations like classified information being stolen, in our military technology, national security information, etc., etc. Things we've had government employees with high security clearances printing and selling to foreign nations. Undermining our technological advancement in the world and undermining our national security. There are thousands of government laptop computers possessing these informations that our government doesn't even know where those computers are!!!!

How do you eliminate those America damaging current failing government issues? You simply employ an information system where the information cannot be saved nor printed by an individual government computer. A system where the information can only be accessed, when it is necessary to perform a government task. You have laptops for tablets owned by the government with GPS tracking systems. Under that type of system you know there are no employees printing and selling national and technological government owned information. Because, they can't print it on paper nor save it to their computer or tablet. The only way they could sell that information is to be sitting side by side with some government person from China, etc. wanting to steal our information. The Chinese government and technologies thief having to sit down and manually reproduce the info. BUT, you just have your system set up to where if one of the government owned laptops/tablets accesses the central database servers and it's coming in on a feed from countries (which the system recognizes through the computer/laptops GPS coordinates in location) we know steal our technology the system automatically blocks access to the information.

Even something as unbelievably stupid as the Fast & Furious scandal under Obama's Department of Justice. Where they told gun dealers to sell thousands of guns to people the government knew were Mexican drug cartels who use those guns to kill American border agents and slaughter thousands of American systems.

It's unbelievable they allowed that in the first place. BUT, accepting the stupidity of our government in doing that as a way to track guns to find out where they end up. Through an advanced government approach in thinking, "When we find a bunch of dead bodies with guns laying around them, we can check the serial numbers to see where the guns came from that we allowed to be sold to murderers." That's our current government thinking. HOW ABOUT PUTTING GPS TRACKING DEVICES IN THE STOCKS OF THE GUNS!!! SO YOU CAN ROUND UP THE DRUG CARTELS IN THEIR GPS IDENTIFIED LOCATIONS BEFORE THEY KILL THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE WITH THEM!!

Newt's the man. He's our desperately needed President at this time in our history. The person we need running this country. In the debate you see that both Newt Gingrich and Herman Cain are both on the same wavelength in what needs to be done to save and redeem America from it's verge of total collapse. But, the difference between Gingrich and Cain is that Gingrich's thought processes are more advanced in the areas they share the same wavelength. Where Herman Cain can tell your philosophically what we need to do and where we need to do it. Newt Gingrich can tell you the same things but take it to the next level. What Herman Cain cannot tell you that Newt Gingrich can is exactly how you do it all the way down to the specific nuts and bolts.

Which is why I've been saying for over a month now. We need to put Gingrich in candidate position of President and Cain in candidate position of Vice President. This gives us the best possible option we could ever hope for in a president in this time in or nation's history. While Cain spends 4 or 8 years mentoring under Gingrich to advance his right direction thinking into his own nuts and bolts specific understanding in the most effective and efficient way to run our country. Gingrich will make so much overwhelming positive reform in government effectiveness an efficiency to positively effect our quality-of-life that even those on the opposite side of ideology will find it hard to not appreciate what America will have become under Gingrich's tenure as President. Which will set things up for Gingrich to easily simply pass the torch to Cain for another four to eight years.

Hell, my son is going to be 20 years old. When he was born we gave him a name. When the government recorded his name in the government system. They made a typo in his name, totally changing his legal name. I spent FIVE years going through all the different agencies trying to get them to correct their typo in his name which is Colby, but the person who entered it into the system used a "D" instead of a "C", Dolby. I started with the Social Security Administration they told me they didn't have the authority to fix THEIR mistake, then they sent me to some other agency which sent me to another agency, which sent me to another agency, which sent me back to the Social Security system. I spent FIVE years going back & forth between all these different "can't make a simple alphabet change" agencies & was never able to accomplish the task of having my son's name corrected to his actual name in the government system.

Now, take a Gingrich approach. I would enter his name in the system, get a chance to confirm information is correct & correct it if I made a mistake. DONE! DONE RIGHT!

Newt Gingrich: "I just put on the table trillions of dollars that would be saved by not paying crooks. Why is it so hard to not penalize good people before you stop paying crooks. You can take existing IBM technology and use it to stop paying crooks.

Why is it so hard to say you can turn this around and pass a bill to contract out to American Express, VISA, and IBM to handle Medicare payments and in 60 days you would save a TRILLION DOLLARS."

Newt Gingrich is probably the smartest most innovative politician we've had in decades. He's laying all of his plans, out there in depth, substance and complete explanation along with his proven track record of having given America a 4.2% unemployment rate, 11 million new jobs, government cost savings of $5 TRILLION leaving office having created a $2.2 TRILLION budget surplus and as the only man in modern times to have balanced America's budget, which he did four years in a row.

He's putting this out there for all Americans to learn, come to understand, like and support. BEFORE, he climbs so far up the polls that the Obama and liberal media attack dogs see him as a threat to Obama and launch their destroy and annihilate strategies against him. By the time Obama and liberal media catch on that's he's the serious challenger opposition to Obama candidate and need to destroy him. his message will already be out there, understood and supported. Creating an, "I don't care about stupid stuff from 15 years ago. He's the man, he's got the ideas, the know how, the track record and ability to give this country and it's people exactly what they need right now. He's our man!"

If Cain goes on a ticket as VP with Gingrich and uses Gingrich as his Washington get things done mentor. Cain will be unstoppable to follow up Gingrich's presidency with his own.

Here’s another personal experience of mine in having to deal with the exact problems Newt Gingrich states undermines our American Federal government’s effectiveness at efficiency and serving the citizen.  Followed by a Newt Gingrich style of innovative thinking pertaining to government.  That I came to on my own once I got in the Newt Gingrich innovative mode of thinking.

I sent in the paper copyright form along with a copy of my CD for copyright registration. THIRTEEN YEARS LATER, I got the form back saying I had forgotten to check a box on the form. THIRTEEN YEARS!!

Now apply Gingrich's line of thinking. For a copyright registration. I could go online to the copyright website. Fill out the application information online, upload a digital copy of my CD, just like how you buy them from iTunes but in reverse, uploading instead of downloading. I punch in my credit card number to pay the fee, I click send. DONE. The copyright office instantly gets my Application information, my copy of my CD, my payment for the fee. It's immediately automatically entered into their system, I get an online receipt with a copyright number on it. DONE. 13 minutes instead of 13 years. Save money in wasted paper, save money in necessary physical storage space, save money in postage costs, save money in dozens of hourly labor costs and more effectively gets the job done. Sounds so obvious, I should feel stupid for being excited about it. BUT, you just aren't conditioned to government seeming, simple, fast, effective and inexpensive.

Here’s a substantive, informative exchange between Gingrich and Cain in areas that directly effect our lives and health from their debate I link below:

GINGRICH:
Medicare pays between $70-120 billion a year to crooks…like dentists who file 982 procedures a day. The Super Committee is not looking at this, because it requires thinking about Government…and getting people in Washington to THINK is a very big challenge.

I wrote a book in 2002 called Saving Lives and Saving Money, and I outlined what to do. Washington will do three stupid things instead of one smart thing.

I just put on the table trillions of dollars that would be saved by not paying crooks. Why is it so hard to not penalize good people before you stop paying crooks. You can take existing IBM technology and use it to stop paying crooks.

Why is it so hard to say you can turn this around and pass a bill to contract out to American Express, VISA, and IBM to handle Medicare payments and in 60 days you would save a TRILLION DOLLARS.

Anyone who currently prefers to go to a premium support system should do it next year. Tom Price has a great bill that says if you want to contract out for healthcare let’s give you more freedom. Medicare is more restrictive than the British system.

When you get the government in the business of defining what you should have, the government will say you don’t need this or that when you do.

Prostate Example — Medicare says not to test for prostate cancer, when lives can be saved if detected quickly. No one who is a urologist or cancer specialist is making these decisions. It is just bureaucrats. You need to move to a place where people get help buying insurance but the family, the patient, and the doctors make the primary decisions on keeping you healthy. Just imagine if there was government approval on IPhones or computers…bureaucrats would stop innovation and would say that 1960 model is just fine for you.

CAIN:
I am supposed to have a minute to disagree with Gingrich, but I don’t disagree with anything. So I would like to instead to add a historical perspective, since Gingrich and I can change the rules as we go. I remember talking about Medicare when I first went to Godfather’s pizza. Things inside the company were easier to control outside. Medicare started in 1965 and our government told us it would cost $6 billion to rollout, and we were told that by 1990 it would cost $12 billion. But in 1990, it actually cost $109 billion. IT WAS A 900% MISS.

How many businesses can survive missing a target like this. Long term government projections about cost have never been right. NAME ONE.

Here's another place you've probably never even thought of pertaining to government. I haven't and you guys surely know by now I'm a "Thinker." :)

The president of a huge worldwide company like Wallmart. Can sit down at his desk and through the information technology systems Wallmart uses to track it's finances. He can tell you where every single dollar of revenue that comes into Wallmart enters the Wallmart financial system, down to the specific cash register, in the specific Wallmart location in the specific town and country throughout every single cash register Wallmart owns across the whole world. He can track every single dollar that comes in as revenue to the Wallmart corporation by simply sitting at his desk, all the way down to the receipt number, credit card number, check number or cash that created that dollar of revenue. IN REAL TIME, AS IT'S HAPPENING!!!

He can do the exact same thing with every dollar of expenses down to who that dollar was paid out to. Wallmart's number of consumer purchases (revenues coming into the system) and expenses (expenses going out of the system) are thousands of multiples more than those of the United States Federal Government. Which has only 112.5 Million purchasers, taxpayers, sources of system revenue, YEARLY. Wallmart, worldwide, probably surpasses that number in a matter of a few MINUTES. My best guess is that the president of Wallmart can probably access this real time information from one cash register in Indonesia from his iPhone while on a golf course in Palm Springs.

So, why is it the United States government has no clue where it's money goes, is spent, gets lost, gets stolen, gets wasted, gets defrauded???!!!! If the Wallmart corporate president can in real time check where every single dollar goes in and out of the corporation. Can see, "Damn our purchaser in this division just paid $400 for a hammer. Immediately fire that person and defund the purchase." Why can't the United States government do that??!!

Because, the United States government operates on a mentality in it's functional systems at a place in technology before the wheel has even been invented. While Wallmart uses technology the most advanced automobile made.

It takes the government THREE YEARS to process a tax return. Wallmart could do it INSTANTLY through it's technology information systems.

Truth is, every single American should be able to go online and see where every single tax dollar is spent. To what agency it was given to, to what source that agency paid that dollar out to, to what purpose that dollar was spent to serve. With the obvious exception of national security. It allows complete government transparency which we should be allowed. It's our money, not the government's money. It puts the equation right-side up again, in the government works for us, is responsible to us, is accountable to us. Not the equation that has been perverted to the exact opposite of it's created purpose for existence under which we live now. Where we are work for the government, we are responsible to the government, we are accountable to the government.

That's Newt Gingrich thinking applied to government systems. He's truly innovative in his vision of perfection in government functionality, cost and time efficiency and in serving the customer, the citizen.

Why have we as a people allowed our government to continually operate in the “dark ages” versus the advanced “technological age” of our current time?  Because, those in government have “brainwashed” us to believe that government exists to serve an ideology.  But, truth government exists to serve it’s people universally, NOT ideologically.  Why has our government chosen to stay in the “dark ages” versus operating in the advanced “technological age” of our time?  Because, they get to operate behind closed doors, blinding us to what they are really doing and why they are doing it.

We have many Federal agencies that serve absolutely not true government purpose.  Providing benefit to all citizens equally and unilaterally.  An example is The Department of Education.  What is the TRUE purpose of The Department Of Education?  To serve function, effective higher level of quality of education in America, turning out students in mass that rank in education product at the top of the world rankings?  NO!! Which is exactly why we are now ranked #19 in education versus other countries in the world.  The Department of Education exists for one and one purpose only.  To serve political ideology.  To indoctrinate American children into a political ideological way of thinking and continuing that ideological indoctrination throughout their whole education.  So, much emphasis is put on liberal ideological indoctrination in our American students.  That the true purpose and responsibility of education is being neglected and ignored, which reflects in the products our American education produces.  Students who cannot compete on an educational level worldwide.  That’s how our current “dark ages” approach to government operates.  That’s why our current government approaches exist as they do.  Purely to serve political ideology, not to best serve it’s citizens, it’s purpose for existence in the first place.

Political ideology should be something that is found, applied and used in thinking from the bottom up.  NOT, the top down as it operates under our current government political system.

Truth is there is not one HONEST democrat out there than can condemn Newt Gingrich.  Because, every time a democrat holds up Bill Clinton's presidency as an example of good leadership creating 11 million of jobs, getting people off of welfare into jobs, balancing the budget four years in a row, having an unemployment rate of 4.2%, and leaving behind a $2 TRILLION budget surplus.  They are actually endorsing Newt Gingrich.  Because, Newt Gingrich was the mastermind who created and passed all of the legislation that created Bill Clinton's positive fiscal legacy.  All Clinton did was sign the bills and legislation into law that Gingrich created. :)

Which creates quite a "pickle" for the democrats. Because, they have to condemn Clinton to condemn Gingrich. :)

MAKE THE TIME TO WATCH THIS DEBATE!! IT WILL CHANGE THE WAY YOU THINK ABOUT GOVERNMENT TO POSITIVE WAYS!!

www.newt.org/news/video-newt-and-herman-cain-debate-entitlements

Newt Gingrich. Our Only True Option Of Saving America and WHY?

Who's the best presidential hopeful to replace Obama and return America to it's greatness? Here's a perspective you need to consider in your ability to answer that question. It’s worth taking a minute to read this. Then click “share.” We elected Obama, purely on "likeable" and "emotion." We totally ignored necessary and applicable experience in electing our current president. We see where that's gotten us. Now it's serious business. We are one president away from complete destruction and insolvency. Here’s some clarity in how to properly answer who’s best for the job.

Here's how I look at it. You've got Wallmart (America), a general retailer of massive available products level, it's in the tank, going down the drain, financially insolvent, four more years of the same leadership and the greatest retailer of all time worldwide will be gone.

You need to hire someone as President of Wallmart to turn it around, make it profitable again, make it function and return it to it's previous effective, productive, well-oiled functional successful machine it once was in it's last great financially successful period, 1990's.

Here's your candidate base for that job. You've got Three former presidents of the 7-11 Corporation (Governor's of States), 7-11 a limited general retailer of limited product offerings; a former President of Godfather's Pizza chain. Then you have the former CEO of Wallmart who was in the number #3 position at Wallmart in the 1990s, a man who was crucial the driving force within Wallmart to the healthy state of Wallmart in the 1990s. A man who was the driving force within Wallmart at the "place" of success and productivity you are trying to save Wallmart from default and return back to in success.

Who am I going to pick? One of the three former 7-11 Corporation presidents? Sure, they have successful leadership as the Presidents of a chain of stores in much different business environments and with a miniscule business model compared to Wallmart. The Godfather Pizza Chain former President? Great guy, I really like him personally, straight up, straight shooter. But, even in his successes with Godfather's Pizza, a limited product retailer. Does his experience really translate to success at running a Wallmart?

OR the former CEO, the guy who was the driving force of the success Wallmart experienced in the state of health that is exactly where we are trying to get Wallmart back to? For me, if I can't afford further risks between how these other candidates from completely different business models, although successful at those levels, will operate in achieving the needs of this necessary new Wallmart leader. Then who would you hire?

Newt. The one who's proven to be able to do the exact job you need done, in the exact environment, business model, system that you need success achieved at saving Wallmart and turning it back into the world leader powerhouse it has historically been.

Hell, Apple fired Steve Jobs because he was a nut, asshole to people and even his own employees. Steve Jobs was brutal on his employees, made them work 12 hours a day until they produced his vision in products. He was NOT LIKEABLE! He refused to accept responsibility for his own child when his girlfriend got pregnant. He was a flat-out asshole as a person. But, being a great guy and likeable was not his job as president of Apple before he was fired.

When Apple started faltering, who did they hire back to run the company, turn it around and make it even more successful? They hired the asshole back and he drove success of the Apple Corporation beyond it's previous state and rocketed it back into one of the greatest corporations of all time. :)

A Gingrich/Cain ticket is the best America could ever hope for at this time in our history.  The stars have lined up for us perfectly in this moment in time and need.  In offering the exact record of success and experience desperately needed in reducing government spending, balancing our budget, reforming welfare, reforming our tax code, creating millions of new jobs and turning our economy back into a well-burning fire house of economic growth.  We've got one chance to fix this.  We have to go with with what we know works.  Tried proven experience in the same place we need it now!

Please click “share” if you have the ability to see the reality and clarity here within.

David Carter

Add blog to our directory.

Newt Gingrich A Modern Day Abraham Lincoln Who Has Proven To Free The Slaves Of Modern Day America!

Let The Democrat/Liberal "Name Calling" Begin. When they can't attack the sound nature of a man's policy, they attack him personally. Don't You Love Kindergarten?

Newt Gingrich's poll numbers have quadrupled as Republicans imagine a Newt vs. Obama debate, and right now is our opportunity to nominate the candidate with an accomplished record and a deep understanding of the complex problems our nation faces. The advocates have already started the name-calling with Mother Jones and Chris Matthews asking “Can Newt Be The First Openly Mean Candidate?” The idea of Newt debating Obama doesn’t send a chill up Matthew’s leg, it sends a cold chill down his spine!

This is going to be a huge week for this campaign. We are going to be talking in detail about taxes, entitlements, and foreign policy, but before we get to all of that, we need a strong finish to October. Saturday, we asked for your help to raise an additional $250,000, and we are well on our way. It takes resources to compete, and we rely on your generous support to keep this campaign surging. Please make a contribution of $5, $25, $50, or any amount up to $2,500 today!

Every contribution matters, but if we are going to be able to reach our goal we need those of you who can afford to make a contribution of more than $100 to do so. As an expression of our gratitude, for today only, everyone who makes a contribution of at least $100 today will receive a very special lapel pin. Help Newt keep the surge going and receive a special gift from all of us here at the campaign by making your contribution of at least $100 before midnight!  www.newt.org

We aren't electing a president of a high school congeniality club. We are electing someone who has the balls to do the right thing for America. I doubt any of us are the same people we were 20 years ago, if we are we haven't advanced much in personal growth and that to me is questionable in a person's ability to be effective, bold, and make the forceful, effective, successful decisions this nation needs to curb it's downward spiral into financial insolvency.

To me the most qualified people are those who have had a history of recognizing mistakes, seeing the need for personal change, being able to admit to personal flaws along the way and seeing the need to grow into better people, change, grow, adapt to the ever changing world. Something we have not seen in the White House even when the need for change to better serve the American people is obvious to all. But, some people seem to think they are incapable of making a "bad call," choosing a flawed approach, admitting to a mistake they've made.

I see they are launching personal assassinations against Herman Cain too. Democrats and Liberals, the supposed "nice" party, will always try to assassinate the character of any black successful person who is not a liberal or on welfare. Let's see... Clarence Thomas, Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, even Jackie Robinson who broke the color barrier for blacks in professional baseball, etc., etc... and now Herman Cain. Why? Because when all you have at your disposal to win is attacking a personal character. Then they must be the right people for the job, because you obviously see no place to attack them on what actually matters, policy, proven effectiveness, success and effectiveness. All it says to me is desperation overwhelming the liberals and democrats.

It's amazing how liberals and democrats attack the most successful of the African-American race in rising above all which should serve as role models to all other African-Americans in seeing hope, faith in themselves, the "it can happen." If an African-American breaks the color barrier, opening the door to new areas of success available to his race. That person is reviled, attacked, denigrated by democrats, liberals. American history has proven that again and again.

Then those same liberals/democrats champion people like African-American Al Sharpton who no one had ever heard of until he jumped in to represent the family publicly of a teenage girl who admittedly FALSELY accused white police officers of raping, beating and shitting on her. That's democrat/liberal credibility? Or Charles Rheingold an African-American senator on the committee in charge of American tax policy, who blatantly lied on his own tax returns to not have to pay certain taxes. That's democrat/liberal credibility?

Truly sad what the democrat party has become. But, then again.. maybe that's just who they've always been. It's indisputable historical fact that the democrats, not republicans fought AGAINST every single piece of civil rights legislation attempted to be passed pertaining to African-Americans and who championed a man who was an officer recruiter and leader in the Klu Klux Klan as a democrat senator until he day he died in 2010. Robert Byrd.

Every piece of legislation brought up on behalf of African-American rights in our history was aggressively fought against to eliminate these civil rights being awarded to African-Americans was challenged and fought against by democrats. Breaking records of filibusters, sending the legislation to committee's to make them go away. It's all historical record, in the votes, in our Congress's minutes records.

I'm not a republican, but unfortunately I've learned that if you are not a liberal democrat, then in their minds your are a republican because it's easier to try and vilify you. Because, if you are free-thinking independent they can't really attack you because you don't fall into any particular group. Pretty much how the Tea Party has been such a problem for the liberal democrats leading them to make baseless claims against free-thinking Americans who do believe in the concept of Martin Luther King's fight for equality, versus liberal democrat policy of racial inequality.

Free-thinking Americans who agree a person should be judged NOT by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. That which created their individual, personal greatness, personal achievement, personally broke racial barriers all NOT based on the color of their skin but the elements within them as colorless people in all things that define "character" in human beings. Democrat/liberal approach to race is, "they can't do it on their own, no faith in the individual, therefore we must do it for them." Conservatives approach races through, "I believe you can do it on your own and we are willing to help you through government policy, not cripple you by making you dependent on government, through tools of education, tools to help you see the greatness within yourself to create your own American dream. Which your liberal democrat sector society will vilify you for, in your daring to step out of the democrat/liberal policy of dependence as a slave to the democrat/liberal plantation.

It really effected me when my daughter drove me through the government dependent black community in Baltimore, MD. What I saw socially and communally was what I would have expected to see 150 years ago traveling through slave shelters of plantations after the work day ended.  I saw the same faces of a sense of "no hope," "it will never get better than this," this is who I am and all I deserve" I would have expected to see traveling through the slave quarters 150 plus years ago after a long day in the cotton fields.

Those people existed in no greater place at the end of the day than they did 150 plus years ago. She works in the inner city schools, hoping to make a difference in a young African-American child's life that may help them some day become an individual, personal success story like Jackie Robinson, Colin Powell, Clarence Thomas, Condoleeze Rice, Herman Cain whom too will be vilified for stepping off the democrat, liberal plantation of crippling government dependence.

My daughter told me they did a study of the government dependent families in Baltimore and 70% of those African-Americans never travel beyond a 35 mile radius from Baltimore during the course of their whole lifetime. They never leave the democrat/liberal plantation because of the crippling dependent slavery driven by democrat/liberal policy towards African-Americans.

Just as many of the plantation slaves of American history 150 years ago never left their own slave plantations once given complete freedom. Because, they found personal freedom to be daunting. All of a sudden, they had to provide for themselves, put a roof over their own heads, feed themselves, educate themselves. All things they'd never had to accept responsibility for as slaves. Exactly, the situation created by liberal democrat government policies of today. All the personal impact of past slavery and current slavery of the American black communities. The slaves from the fields of 150 plus years ago, many chose to stay with all they new. Dependence on their Massa's for personal sustenance. Due to liberal/democrat federal government policies towards our current African-American population. Many of them have not elevated in personal lifestyle, other than physical impugning since the beginning of this nation in self-elevation because of being forced into positions through liberal/democrat policies of total dependence on someone else for their personal sustenance. To me to purposely cripple a person's spirit, ambition, motivation, hope, fortitude, etc. is in itself a human rights violation.

What was the purpose of a whip on plantations before African-Americans were freed from physical slavery? To break a man's spirit, to undermine his internal nature, elements of character that make him walk in step with the other slaves, "what a good slave does," with what his slave owner's wanted for THEMSELVES.

The only difference between the strands of the whip of past times and current democrat/liberal policy of today towards African-Americans is the visible, physical scars. The scars on the souls and spirits of black slaves of the past plantations and black slaves of the current democrat/liberal Massas are exactly the same.

This is EXACTLY what Herman Cain was speaking to in his statement, "There's a portion of the African-American community that has been brain-washed to always support the democrat party." The modern day African-American slaves of the liberal/democrat federal government policies, who vote to support their Massas. So, they will be allowed to continue to live on the slave plantations because that's the only way of life they know. Just like many African-American slaves for physical slavery remained on the slave plantations after they were given full physical freedoms and independence from the institution of physical slavery, because it was the only way of life they knew. Total dependence on someone else for sustenance.

Why did the owners of slave plantations of 150 plus years ago own slaves? Personal wealth and personal power in society. Why do the liberal/democrat politicians in Washington own welfare, section 8, etc. slave plantations of today in their liberal/democrat party policies towards blacks today? The exact same thing. Personal wealth ad personal power.

It was an abomination 150 plus years ago and it's an abomination today. Every step of the way it's always been driven by democrats. Fighting civil rights legislation, Jim Crow laws, poll taxes, etc. Which despite democrat intent on keeping the black population of this nation downtrodden was defeated. How did they respond, by creating a new slave plantation within the federal government to continue to keep black Americans downtrodden, under their control and under their thumb.

Which is EXACTLY why I support Newt Gingrich. Newt wrote his own Emancipation Proclamation and freed 66% of the current liberal/democrat slaves at that time. He's proven through his own successful legislative policy that he is against modern day slavery of the democrat party. His welfare reform during his tenure as Speaker Of The House, freed 66% of the black slaves of modern day liberal/democrat government slave plantation. Allowing those 66% of Americans freedom to no longer be slaves to the liberal/democrat federal slave plantation of "welfare." Allowing that 66% of black Americans to be able to leave the liberal/democrat plantations and find their own person freedom through self-sustenance in jobs and education.

Truth is American History is a bitch to liberal democrats.  Because, if Americans truly studied and understood the history of the democrat party through our nation's history in never allowing African-Americans to be free from slavery of any kind.  Then the democrats would cease to exist.  Which perhaps is why they've made sure our American Education System is a place of social engineering as opposed to the purposes for which it was created to educate in the disciplines of Science, English, Math, HISTORY, etc.

The democratic party of a hundred and fifty years of yesterdays was no different than it is today.  The democratic party has always controlled the African-American population of America with fear.  Fear of whippings, hangings, loss of government sustenance they have been convinced they cannot live without. 

 They don't treat their opposing parties any different either.  Other than, instead of threats of physical destruction and hanging like this cartoon printed in a newspaper in 1868.  The democrat donkey, also core of the Klu Klux Klan, as the democrat donkey is marked, threatening Ohio republicans if they tried to make a positive difference in the life of African-Americans.  No, today they don't do a physical lynching, they do a character lynching, because they can't attack obvious sound, positive, effective policy for the lives of all Americans.  It doesn't matter whether you are black or white.  If you dare try to help free the African-American slaves of their liberal/democrat policy slave plantations.  You will be symbolically lynched.

History stands on it's own.  Before you claim your are a liberal democrat.  You should truly understand the depth of what you are saying in continuous historical ideology and legacy.

You possess no credibility, when you say you exists in political ideology to elevate the downtrodden, poor, disadvantaged.  When as a party you oppose every attempt in idea and policy to elevate those exact same people from the exact same place you claim to exist to serve.  You can't attack school vouchers that allow poor black kids from the government paid for welfare rolls to have a choice to go to better schools, get a better opportunity for self-elevation and personal dependence, versus government dependence.  You can't claim that government has served any positive purpose other than re-stocking the monthly trough of food and shelter for these people.  When anyone who truly cared would want to see more for these people finding self-elevation to a better place in life.  Which can never come from government sustenance, which is simply "existence."   Not quality of life. 

You can't claim you "care" to see these lower level people in our society to rise to better places in society.  When you revile, attack and attempt to destroy those of their own races who made it out of the place of downtrodden, poor, disadvantaged sector of American society.  The people you should be using as examples and role models of hope, faith, "it can happen," "he/she did it and you can too!"  You democrats and liberals attack, try to destroy for having done exactly what you say you exist to create in our society.  You don't choose to use the successful who did prove to accomplish all you want to see for the downtrodden, poor, disadvantaged sectors of our society.  The people you should be using as heroes to those your claim to exist to serve and make their lives better places.  No, you choose to try and destroy exactly what you claim to exist to promote.  If one of those people does rise totally based on the content of their character and NOT the color of their skin.  You will try to destroy them too.  As history has proven. 

A black American who has done it all on his own without government assistance to achieve great things, break racial barriers for his fellow man of his own race.  You liberal democrats have proven in how you approach such successful people of color, is your arched enemy you will destroy if humanly possible.

Something to think about the next time you call yourself a democrat, liberal!  Throughout history liberal democrats have served to try and destroy every successful person of color who found success without being dependent on your liberal, democrat governmental "keep them in check" policies.  Booker T. Washington, Clarence Thomas, Martin Luther King, Jackie Robinson, Bill Cosby, Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, Herman Cain, etc., etc., etc.

These are not Newt Gingrich's words, opinions, statements, etc.  Just my simple observations when looking at the big picture of today's American politics.  Newt's the on current presidential candidate who's already proven his ability to improve the quality o life for ALL Americans in a colorblind way.  "Not based on the color of one's skin, but by the content of their character."  He created 11 MILLION JOBS for ALL races, as Speaker Of The House.  That's patriotic, that's called "being American."

Something to think about.